The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROBERT H. HAVEMANN ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0287 Application No. 09/216,214 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before OWENS, KRATZ and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal was taken pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 8-10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 27, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellant's invention relates to a transistor structure. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 9 and 10, which are reproduced below.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007