The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GUNTHER KNEBEL, LAJOS NYARSIK, HOLGER FRIEDRICH HEINRICH EICKHOFF, and HANS LEHRACH ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0510 Application No. 09/883,435 ____________ ON BRIEF ___________ DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 6 through 10, 12 through 24, 27 through 36, 38, 53 and 54, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellants, the invention is directed to a reaction vessel to produce crystals from a substance in liquid form or in solution, where the vessel comprises at least one housing part having several walled reaction chambers, each forming aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007