Appeal No. 2005-0510
Application No. 09/883,435
reaction area that is recessed from the reservoir into the lid or
cover slip.
For the foregoing reasons, we determine that the examiner has
not established a prima facie case of obviousness in view of the
reference evidence for claims 27 and 36, and claims 28, 29 and 38
which depend therefrom. Accordingly, the examiner’s rejection of
claims 27-29, 36 and 38 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Kim is
reversed.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007