Ex Parte Yanagisawa et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0900                                                        
          Application No. 10/098,588                                                  


          Representative claim 2 is reproduced as follows:                            
                       2.  A local dry etching apparatus for removing                 
               unevenness on a surface of a semiconductor wafer,                      
               comprising:                                                            
               a nozzle from which a gas including an                                 
          activated species produced by a plasma is injected                          
          locally to the surface of the semiconductor wafer; and                      
               a wafer table supporting the semiconductor                             
          wafer concentrically thereon, a radius of the wafer table                   
          being larger than a radius of the semiconductor wafer,                      
               wherein a difference between the radius of the                         
          semiconductor wafer and the radius of the wafer table is                    
          10 to 40 percent of a half value width of an etching rate                   
          distribution peak of the gas injected from the nozzle.                      
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Yanagisawa et al. (Yanagisawa)  5,980,769           Nov. 09, 1999           
          Shinozuka et al. (Shinozuka)    6,136,213           Oct. 24, 2000           
          Claims 2, 3, 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                         
          § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to                 
          particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter              
          which appellants regard as the invention.  Claims 2, 3, 8 and               
          9 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of             
          obviousness the examiner offers Yanagisawa in view of Shinozuka.            



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007