Ex Parte Sandhu et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not
                                           binding precedent of the Board.                                     





                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                                _____________                                                  
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                _____________                                                  
                                         Ex parte GURTEJ S. SANDHU                                             
                                             and TRUNG T. DOAN                                                 
                                                _____________                                                  
                                             Appeal No. 2005-1031                                              
                                           Application No. 09/998,073                                          
                                               ______________                                                  
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                      
                                               _______________                                                 


             Before HANLON, TIMM and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
             HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                                                                                                              
                   This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims    
             46-58 and 60-69, all of the claims pending in the application.  The claims on appeal are directed 
             to a system for treating the surface of a workpiece.  Claims 46 and 64 are representative and read
             as follows:                                                                                       







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007