Ex Parte Barnett et al - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                           
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            


                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   ____________                                                        
                               Ex parte PHILIP C. BARNETT and DAVID SOWARDS                                            
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                               Appeal No. 2005-1295                                                    
                                             Application No. 10/376,682                                                
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                        
              Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                




                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner’s final                      
              rejection of claims 1-6 and 8-14.                                                                        
                     We affirm-in-part.                                                                                














Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007