Ex Parte Sambasivam et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-2073                                                        
          Application No. 10/033,854                                                  

               Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                       
               1.  A method of fabricating a microelectronic package,                 
          comprising:                                                                 
               providing a substrate having a first surface, an opposing              
          second surface, and a plurality of lands disposed on said first             
          surface;                                                                    
               forming a through-hole extending from said substrate first             
          surface to said substrate second surface;                                   
               providing a microelectronic die having an active surface, a            
          back surface, and a plurality of pads disposed on said active               
          surface in a corresponding relationship to said plurality of                
          substrate lands;                                                            
               electrically attaching said plurality of substrate lands to            
          said plurality of corresponding microelectronic die pads with a             
          plurality of conductive bumps,                                              
               disposing an underfill material through said through-hole              
          such that said underfill material is dispersed by capillary                 
          action between said microelectronic die active surface and said             
          substrate first surface.                                                    
               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Akram et al. (Akram)          5,766,982          June 16, 1998              
          Cha et al. (Cha)              6,242,798          June 05, 2001              
          The admitted prior art described in appellants’ application.                
                                                                                     
               Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As               
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers the admitted prior              
          art in combination with Akram and Cha.                                      



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007