Appeal No. 2005-2073 Application No. 10/033,854 prior art and Akram are combined, the claimed invention results [answer, pages 6-10]. We will sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-20 based on the teachings of the admitted prior art and Akram. The admitted prior art teaches a dispensing needle for dispersing the underfill material in the gap formed by the die active surface and the substrate surface [application, Figure 13]. The assembly of Figure 13 appears to be situated horizontally. Akram teaches that underfilling a flip-chip oriented in the horizontal direction causes the underfill material to have bubbles, air pockets or voids [column 1, line 65 to column 2, line 1]. Akram solves this problem by applying the underfill material to the assembly while it is tilted in the vertical direction. Akram teaches that it was well known in the prior art for underfill material to be dispersed into the gap from the sides of the flip- chip or by way of a through hole [column 1, lines 45-58]. Akram also teaches these alternatives by the embodiments of Figures 1 and 2 and the embodiments of Figures 5-7. Thus, our first finding is that the artisan would have been motivated to combine the teachings of Akram with the admitted prior art in order to solve the underfill problem related to horizontal assemblies. Our second finding is that Akram teaches that the underfill 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007