Appeal No. 2005-1997 Page 13
Application No. 09/493,319
pixels, we are persuaded the latter reference would have suggested locating the single
memory closer to the pixels that share the memory that to the pixels that do not.
Therefore, we affirm the obviousness rejection of claim 45 and of claims 46-48 and 53,
which fall therewith.
C. CLAIM 49
Rather than separately addressing claim 49, the appellant relies on the argument
he advanced for claim 45, (Appeal Br. at 11), which we have found unpersuasive supra.
Therefore, we also affirm the obviousness rejection of claim 49.
III. CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejections of claims 45-49 and 50-54 under § 103(a) are
affirmed.
"Any arguments or authorities not included in the brief will be refused
consideration by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. . . ." 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.192(a). Accordingly, our affirmance is based only on the arguments made in the
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007