Ex Parte Huang - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2005-1997                                                                        Page 2                  
               Application No. 09/493,319                                                                                          



                       The invention at issue on appeal concerns silicon light modulators ("SLMs").                                
               According to the appellant, many applications use SLMs.  For example, a color                                       
               projector may use three SLMs to modulate red, green, and blue light beams,                                          
               respectively, to produce a multicolored composite image.  As another example, a                                     
               display for a laptop computer may include an SLM along with red, green, and blue color                              
               filters selectively mounted over the pixel cells to produce a multicolored composite                                
               image.  (Spec. at 1.)                                                                                               


                       Figure 1 of the appellant's specification shows that a known SLM 1 features liquid                          
               crystal display  ("LCD") pixel cells 25, which form corresponding pixels of an image.                               
               Each pixel cell 25 is part of an SLM cell 20, which also includes a capacitor 24 that                               
               stores a charge to maintain the appropriate voltage "on" the pixel cell.  The SLM cells                             
               are arranged in a rectangular array 6 of rows and columns.  (Id.)  The rows are                                     
               associated with row lines 14; the columns are associated with column lines 16.  Each                                
               pair of row lines and column lines uniquely selects an SLM cell to transfer a charge (in                            




               the Summary of the Invention section of his brief, the appellant merely reproduces                                  
               pages 4-7 of his specification.  (Appeal Br. at 2-6.)  Because such a reproduction is not                           
               a concise explanation, it fails to satisfy the aforementioned rule.  We ask the examiner's                          
               help in objecting to such reproductions in the future.                                                              
                                                                                                                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007