The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte Samson Huang
____________
Appeal No. 2005-1997
Application No. 09/493,319
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRY, LEVY, and MacDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
A patent examiner rejected claims 45-54. The appellant appeals therefrom under
35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND1
1An appeal "brief shall contain . . . [a] concise explanation of the invention defined
in the claims involved in the appeal. . . ." 37 C.F.R. § 1.192 (c)(5)(v)(2003). Here, in
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007