Ex Parte Umeda et al - Page 5




              Appeal No. 2005-2408                                                                Παγε 5                
              Application No. 09/783,548                                                                                


              strip includes a thermal element 36 capable of providing heat which comprises an                          
              exothermic composition comprising oxidation chemistry (col. 4, lines 13 to 17; Fig. 2).                   
                     When it is necessary to select elements of various teachings in order to form the                  
              claimed invention, we ascertain whether there is any suggestion or motivation in the                      
              prior art to make the selection made by the appellants.  Obviousness cannot be                            
              established by combining the teachings of the prior art to produce the claimed invention,                 
              absent some teaching, suggestion or incentive supporting the combination.  The extent                     
              to which such suggestion must be explicit in, or may be fairly inferred from, the                         
              references, is decided on the facts of each case, in light of the prior art and its                       
              relationship to the appellants' invention.  As in all determinations under 35 U.S.C.                      
              § 103, the decision maker must bring judgment to bear.  It is impermissible, however,                     
              simply to engage in a hindsight reconstruction of the claimed invention, using the                        
              appellants' structure as a template and selecting elements from references to fill the                    
              gaps.  The references themselves must provide some teaching whereby the appellants'                       
              combination would have been obvious.  In re Gorman, 933 F.2d 982, 986, 18 USPQ2d                          
              1885, 1888 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (citations omitted).  That is, something in the prior art as a                
              whole must suggest the desirability, and thus the obviousness, of making the                              
              combination.  See In re Beattie, 974 F.2d 1309, 1312, 24 USPQ2d 1040, 1042 (Fed.                          
              Cir. 1992); Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GmbH v. American Hoist and Derrick Co., 730                         
              F.2d 1452, 1462, 221 USPQ 481, 488 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                                                      








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007