The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RAVI GANESAN, TIMOTHY SCOTT RENSHAW
and PETER KIGHT
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-2744
Application No. 09/849,979
______________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 7, 2006
_______________
Before GROSS, BLANKENSHIP and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of
claims 58 through 81. For the reasons stated infra we sustain the examiner’s
rejection of claims 58, 60 through 62, 65, 67, 69, 71 through 73, 76, 78, 80 and
81. However, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 59, 63, 64,
66, 68, 70, 74, 75, 77 and 79. Further, we enter a new grounds of rejection
against claims 59, 70 and 81.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007