Ex Parte Ganesan et al - Page 12



                Appeal No. 2005-2744                                                                           
                Application No. 09/849,979                                                                     

                      Appellants argue, on pages 13 of the reply brief:                                        
                      [T]he examiner has failed to identify any teaching or suggestion within Van              
                      Dusen (and it is respectfully submitted that there is none) of an electronic             
                      greeting card service [i.e. a particular type of first entity] receiving the             
                      request, generating the electronic greeting including the notification of the            
                      monetary gift, and (iii) transmitting the generated electronic greeting to the           
                      designated recipient, and also of a payment service [i.e. a particular type              
                      of second entity and not the electronic greeting card service] directing the             
                      crediting the gift amount to the deposit account.                                        

                      We disagree with appellants.  As stated supra with respect to claim 58, we               
                find that Van Dusen does teach the generation of electronic greeting card with                 
                the notification of a monetary gift.  We consider the entity, Amazon.com, which                
                generates the electronic greeting card to meet the claimed “electronic greeting                
                card service.”  Further, we note that claim 58, recites the limitation “crediting of           
                funds equal to the monetary gift amount to a deposit account.”  Claim 58 does                  
                not identify if the beneficiary of the deposit account is the donor, recipient or              
                electronic greeting card service.  Claim 67 adds the limitation “crediting of funds            
                is directed by a payment service provider” thus identifying that the funds are                 
                credited by a fourth entity (a payment service provider).  Thus, we consider the               
                scope of claim 67 to be broad and include crediting funds by a payment service                 
                provider into a deposit account of either the recipient or the electronic greeting             
                card service.  We find that Van Dusen teaches that the donor can pay for the gift              
                certificate by credit card. See column 3, lines 57 through 60.  We consider the                
                credit transaction necessarily requires debiting a donor’s credit card and crediting           
                of the merchant’s account.  Thus, we find Van Dusen teaches that a payment                     
                                                      12                                                       




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007