Appeal No. 2005-2744
Application No. 09/849,979
58, 65, 67-69, 75 and 79, … the Examiner has also failed to establish a prima
facie basis for the obviousness rejection of claims 58, 65, 67-69, 75-76 and 79.”
As stated supra, we sustain the examiner’s anticipation rejection of claims
58, 65, 67, 69, and 76 and we reverse the examiner’s anticipation rejection of
claims 68, 75 and 79. Accordingly, we sustain the examiner’s obviousness
rejection of rejection of claims 58, 65, 67, 69, and 76 and we reverse the
examiner’s obviousness rejection of claims 68, 75 and 79 for the reasons stated
supra with respect to the respective anticipation rejections.
15
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007