Ex Parte Ganesan et al - Page 21



                Appeal No. 2005-2744                                                                           
                Application No. 09/849,979                                                                     

                             Claim 81 requires that debiting of funds equal to the monetary gift               
                      amount be directed from a deposit account at a financial institution                     
                      associated with the requesting donor to a deposit account at a financial                 
                      institution associated with the service provider.  The claim also requires               
                      that crediting of funds to the deposit account of the designated recipient               
                      be directed from the deposit account associated with the service provider.               

                However, Appellants do not identify how claim 81 differs from the references                   
                cited by the examiner.                                                                         
                      The examiner states on page 11 of the answer:                                            
                      Official Notice was taken that the broad limitation, wherein the funds are               
                      directed to be credited to the deposit account from the deposit account                  
                      associated with the service provider, was old an well known in the art.                  
                      Despite its convoluted language, this limitation reads on one bank                       
                      customer depositing funds into another bank customer’s account wherein                   
                      the customer’s belong to the same bank.  As demonstrated by the                          
                      references offered by the Examiner [the articles Wijnen, and “Person-To-                 
                      anywhere Payments Are Here With Citybanks’ C2it] this step is neither                    
                      new or non-obvious when viewed in light of Van Dusen.                                    

                      We concur with the examiner’s findings.  Initially we note, that claim 81                
                does contain several ambiguities and for the reasons stated infra we now reject                
                claim 81 under 35 U.S.C.  § 112 second paragraph.   Further, we note that claim                
                81 does not contain limitations directed to crediting the recipient’s account from             
                the service provider’s account. As stated supra, with respect to claim 67, Van                 
                Dusen teaches that the donor can pay with a credit card, and that the credit                   
                transaction necessarily requires debiting a donor’s account and crediting a                    
                merchant’ account.  We note that this function of credit cards is discussed briefly            
                on page 2 of Wijnen  (“Business readily establish merchant accounts to process                 

                                                      21                                                       




Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007