Ex Parte Turpin et al - Page 5



          Appeal No. 2006-0002                                                        
          Application No. 09/935,531                                                  
          Smith and Thong would not provide an indication of channel                  
          activity of a communication link as claimed.  In a related                  
          argument (id., at 4), Appellants assert that neither Smith nor              
          Thong disclose a “time versus time” display in which data                   
          channels or time slots are displayed along an axis orthogonal to            
          a time axis.                                                                
          After reviewing the Smith and Thong references in light of                  
          the arguments of record, we find no error in the Examiner’s                 
          stated position (Answer, page 6) which concludes that the                   
          frequency span displayed in Smith along an axis orthogonal to the           
          displayed time axis corresponds to the claimed data channel                 
          display.  We agree with the Examiner that, contrary to                      
          Appellants’ contention, data channels are not necessarily defined           
          by time slots, but, rather, would also be recognized by the                 
          ordinarily skilled artisan as encompassing frequency bands such             
          as would be defined by specified widths in the frequency span               
          along the horizontal axis in the display of Smith.  Also, as                
          pointed out by the Examiner, there is no language in claim 1                
          which limits the claimed data channels to “time slots.”  In our             
          view, Appellants’ arguments improperly attempt to narrow the                
          scope of the claim by implicitly adding disclosed limitations               
          which have no basis in the claim.  See In re Morris, 127 F.3d               

                                          5                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007