Ex Parte Henneken et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-0264                                                            
          Application No. 10/217,064                                                      

          independent of adjusting of concentrations of other process-bath                
          components.                                                                     
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                       
          evidence of obviousness:                                                        
          Araki et al. (Araki)               4,353,933           Oct. 12, 1982            
          van der Putten                     5,527,734           Jun. 18, 1996            
          Zirino et al. (Zirino)             4,058,446           Nov. 15, 1977            
          Fakler et al. (Fakler)             6,086,956           Jul. 11, 2000            
          Yamakawa et al. (Yamakawa)         4,970,571           Nov. 13, 1990            
          Ying et al. (Ying)                 4,789,484           Dec.  6, 1988            
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a method for                  
          depositing an adhesion-promoting layer on the metallic layer of a               
          chip.  The adhesion-promoting layer is deposited by using a wet                 
          multi-component process bath which comprises an inhibitor, such                 
          as lead.  The method analyzes the concentration of lead during                  
          the process and adjusts the concentration to a constant value.                  
          The adjustment is independent of adjustments to concentrations of               
          other components of the bath.  Appealed claim 10 additionally                   
          recites that the sequence of adding first, second and third                     
          regenerating solutions serves to decouple the regulation of the                 
          lead concentration from the regulation of the concentration of                  
          the other bath components.                                                      
               Appealed claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                   
          second paragraph.  Also, the appealed claims stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:                                                     

                                           -2-                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007