The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL GERLE, HANS-ALBERT EHLERT and EBERHARD KONIG
____________
Appeal No. 2006-0436
Application No. 09/942,4651
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, KRATZ, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 15, which are all of the claims
pending in the above-identified application. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER
The subject matter on appeal relates to aromatic
1Application for patent filed Aug. 29, 2001, entitled, Aromatic polyisocyanates
blocked by pyrazole or pyrazole derivatives and the preparation and use thereof.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007