Appeal No. 2006-0436 Application No. 09/942,465 Deiner et al. (Deiner) 4,834,764 May 30, 1989 Reiff et al. (Reiff ‘737) 5,693,737 Apr. 21, 19932 Baumbach et al. (Baumbach) 5,723,536 Oct. 22, 19973 Konig et al. (Konig) 6,187,860 Sep. 15, 19994 REJECTIONS Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as indefinite for failing to particularly point out 2 The appellants have not challenged the examiner’s determination that Reiff ‘737 corresponds to EP 537578 relied upon by the appellants. See the Brief in its entirety. 3 The appellants have not challenged the examiner’s determination that Baumbach corresponds to EP 802210 relied upon by the appellants. See the Brief in its entirety. 4 The appellants have not challenged the examiner’s determination that Konig corresponds to EP 942023 relied upon by the appellants. See the Brief in its entirety. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007