Ex Parte Ajbani et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                         
                       publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                      

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                          ____________                                                             
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                          ____________                                                             
                          Ex parte MANOJ AJBANI, CHRISTOPHER KIEHL,                                                
                          BRUCE RAYMOND HAHN and KEVIN JAMES PYLE                                                  
                                          ____________                                                             
                                     Appeal No. 2006-0494                                                          
                                  Application No. 10/285,801                                                       
                                          ____________                                                             
                                            ON BRIEF                                                               
                                          ____________                                                             
           Before KRATZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent                                      
           Judges.                                                                                                 
           KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                 This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                            
           rejection of claims 1-14.                                                                               
                                          BACKGROUND                                                               
                 Appellants' invention relates to a tread supporting ring                                          
           comprising a sulfur cured rubber composition.  An understanding                                         
           of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim                                       
           1, which is reproduced below.                                                                           














Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007