Ex Parte Ajbani et al - Page 2



           Appeal No. 2006-0494                                                Παγε 2                              
           Application No. 10/285,801                                                                              

                 1. A tread supporting ring for use with a rim for a tire                                          
           having two beads comprising a sulfur cured rubber composition                                           
           composed of:                                                                                            
                 (A) 65 to 95 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of                                           
           rubber (phr) of a first rubber containing olefinic unsaturation;                                        
                 (B) 5 to 35 phr of a rubber having nylon side chains grafted                                      
           thereto, and                                                                                            
                 (C) 1 to 40 phr of at least one nylon.                                                            
                                                                                                                  
                 In addition to alleged admitted prior art, the prior art                                          
           references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                                       
           appealed claims are:                                                                                    
           Pyke et al. (Pyke)   4,996,263   Feb. 26, 1991                                                          
           Burlett et al. (Burlet)  5,268,134   Dec. 07, 1993                                                      
           Masson et al. (Masson)  6,667,361   Dec. 23, 2003                                                       
                                                        (filed Jan. 12, 2001)                                      
                 Claims 1-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                      
           unpatentable over Masson in view of Pyke and Burlett.  Claims 1-                                        
           14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable                                        





















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007