Ex Parte Cattell et al - Page 21




                 Appeal No. 2006-0673                                                                                 Page 21                     
                 Application No. 09/919,555                                                                                                       



                 molecular moieties, information regarding the nature of attachment of the molecular                                              
                 moieties to the substrate surface, information relating to experimental conditions that                                          
                 describe potential uses of the molecular moieties, and/or information relating to the                                            
                 results of such experiments.  The information may be electronically, magnetically,                                               
                 optically, and/or mechanically readable."  (¶ 0008 (emphases added).)  Ellson explains                                           
                 that its "technology allows an array manufacturer to produce customized arrays to order                                          
                 for customers who provide the desired specifications."  (¶ 0004.)  We find that Ellson's                                         
                 inclusion of shipping information in the storage media teaches the claimed forwarding of                                         
                 data to a location remote from where an array is fabricated to the premises of                                                   
                 customers.  Therefore, we affirm the rejection of claim 1 and of claims 2, 4-16, and                                             
                 47-54, which fall therewith, as obvious over Perttunen and Ellson.                                                               


                                     D. OBVIOUSNESS OVER PERTTUNEN, ELLSON, AND ZELENY                                                            
                         The examiner finds, "Zelany et al . . . teach that . . . control probes are useful for                                   
                 calibrating and adjusting [a] scanner thereby facilitating scanning (Column 3, lines 19-                                         
                 25.)  (Examiner's Answer at 17.)  The appellants do not contest this finding but merely                                          
                 reference the "reasons described above."  (Reply Br. at  24.)  Having been                                                       
                 unpersuaded by these reasons, we affirm the rejection of claims 45 and 46 as obvious                                             
                 over Perttunen, Ellson, and Zeleny.                                                                                              








Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007