Ex Parte 5253341 et al - Page 79




               Reexamination Control No. 90/005,742                                                                                   
               Patent 5,253,341                                                                                                       

          1    (col.19, ll. 27-61), he does not mention transmitting either type of audio information in digital                      
          2    form.                                                                                                                  
          3            McCalley discloses a digital, interactive communication system for transmitting, at a                          
          4    subscriber's request, still-frame television video with an accompanying audio message.                                 
          5    McCalley, col. 1, ll. 5-8.  The video/audio presentations are transmitted in the form of digital                       
          6    packets of information to a plurality of presentation players strategically located in the vicinity                    
          7    of the subscriber, with each packet being uniquely addressed to the requesting subscriber.  Id. at                     
          8    col. 2, ll. 42-47.  The examiner states the rejection as follows:                                                      
          9                    Pocock et al. did not expressly disclose the playback of digital                                       
         10            audio.  McCalley et al. aught the use of digital audio.  It would have been                                    
         11            obvious . . . to modify the teaching of Pocock et al. with that of McCalley                                    
         12            to gain the benefit of more accurate reproduction of the original signal as                                    
         13            expressly taught by McCalley (col. 2, lines 29-32).                                                            
         14                                                                                                                          
         15    3d Action at 107, para. 49; Final Action at 260, para. 48.  The lines cited by the examiner appear                     
         16    in McCalley's "Summary of the Invention" and read as follows: "It is another object of the                             
         17    presentation player of the present invention to process both video and audio signals in a digital                      
         18    format and thereby provide a more accurate reproduction of the original signals."  While the                           
         19    examiner does not explain which of Pocock's two types of audio information he is proposing to                          
         20    transmit in digital from, we hold that it would have been obvious in view of McCalley that when                        
         21    Pocock's video information is being transmitted in digital form, it would have been obvious to                         
         22    transmit the background audio and presentation audio in digital form in order to realize                               
         23    McCalley's above-quoted goal of providing more accurate reproduction of the original audio and                         
         24    video signals.  Dr. Koopman's argument that the passage in McCalley cited by the examiner is                           
                                                            - 79 -                                                                    





Page:  Previous  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007