Ex Parte 5253341 et al - Page 72




               Reexamination Control No. 90/005,742                                                                                   
               Patent 5,253,341                                                                                                       

          1            Dependent claim 96 specifies that the response comprises an animation sequence.  The                           
          2    examiner reads this limitation on "116, 8, abstract, col. 12, lines 5-12."  3d Action at 96, para.                     
          3    35; Final Action at 251, para. 35.  The numeral  “116” apparently refers to modulator 116 in                           
          4    Figure 5, which depicts the components of the user terminal.  This numeral is not mentioned in                         
          5    the specification but is shown in Figure 5 as designating a line connecting controller 104 to                          
          6    telephone interface 122.  Dr. Koopman correctly notes that these numerals and the cited passages                       
          7    do not indicate that the requested presentation can comprise an animated sequence.  2d Koopman                         
          8    Decl. at 187, para. 404.  The examiner has not explained why Dr. Koopman's criticism is                                
          9    incorrect or asserted that another part of  Pocock discloses an animated sequence.  Final Action                       
         10    at  217-18, para. 404; Answer at 206-07, para. 404.  The rejection for anticipation of claim 96                        
         11    over Pocock is therefore reversed.                                                                                     
         12            Claim 100 repeats the preamble and paragraphs (a) to (d) of claim 93 and recites as                            
         13    paragraph (e): "wherein said compressed or non-compressed response comprises an image,"                                
         14    which clearly reads on Pocock's disclosure of transmitting video frames.  The rejection of claim                       
         15    100 for anticipation by Pocock is therefore affirmed.                                                                  
         16            Claim 101 repeats the preamble and paragraphs (a) to (d) of claim 93 and recites as                            
         17    step (e):                                                                                                              
         18                    (e)  wherein said compressed or non-compressed response is                                             
         19            compressed prior to receipt at said remote query and data retrieval means,                                     
         20            and wherein said compressed response is decompressed at said remote                                            
         21            query and data retrieval means using an asymmetric technique                                                   
         22            corresponding to an inverse operation of the technique used to compress                                        
         23            said compressed or non-compressed response.                                                                    
         24                                                                                                                           
         25    Regarding the first of these "wherein" clauses, the examiner properly relies on Pocock's                               
                                                            - 72 -                                                                    





Page:  Previous  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007