Ex Parte 5253341 et al - Page 70




               Reexamination Control No. 90/005,742                                                                                   
               Patent 5,253,341                                                                                                       

          1    to implement some computers as portable “laptop” units.  Furthermore, even without the benefit                         
          2    of this testimony we would hold that it would have been obvious to implement Walter’s data                             
          3    receiving station as a portable “laptop” unit for the convenience of the user.   See also DyStar,                      
          4    464 F.3d at 1368, 80 USPQ2d at 1651 (“an implicit motivation to combine exists . . . when the                          
          5    ‘improvement’ is technology-independent and the combination of references results in a product                         
          6    or process that is more desirable, for example because it is stronger, cheaper, cleaner, faster,                       
          7    lighter, smaller, more durable, or more efficient.”).                                                                  
          8            We are accordingly affirming the rejection of claim 103 for obviousness over Walter in                         
          9    view of Dr. Koopman's testimony.                                                                                       
         10    R.  The rejections based on Pocock                                                                                     
         11                                                                                                                           
         12            (1)  Claims 93, 96, 100-02, and 104 – anticipated by Pocock?                                                   
         13                                                                                                                           
         14            Pocock discloses systems for selectively distributing video presentations to viewers,                          
         15    more particularly systems for enabling viewers to interactively select still frame video images                        
         16    and accompanying audio to be distributed to them over a television system such as a cable                              
         17    network.  Pocock, col. 1, ll. 7-12.  The video presentation can represent, for example, the houses                     
         18    being offered for sale by a real estate service, in which case video frames showing the available                      
         19    houses are individually retrieved from a suitable video storage medium.  Id. at col. 1, ll. 18-24.                     
         20    The video information is stored in presentation system 10 (Fig. 1) at a central location in a                          
         21    compressed format,    id. at col. 4, ll. 39-40, and upon read-out is decompressed by the DVS                           
         22    (Digital Video System) 40 in Figure 2 to produce a video signal.     Id. at col. 5, ll. 36-39.  The user               
         23    uses the remote control 16 to enter instructions into the user terminal 14, col. 3, ll. 38-41, which                   
                                                            - 70 -                                                                    





Page:  Previous  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007