Ex Parte 5253341 et al - Page 75




               Reexamination Control No. 90/005,742                                                                                   
               Patent 5,253,341                                                                                                       

          1            Claim 95, which depends on claim 93, adds that "said compressed or non-compressed                              
          2    response comprises an image that has been differentially compressed prior to receipt of said                           
          3    query."  The examiner correctly characterizes Pocock column 19, line 27 to column 15, line 15                          
          4    and column 4, lines 39-40 as disclosing that compression occurs prior to receipt of a request.  3d                     
          5    Action at 103, para. 43; Final Action at 257, para. 42.  Pocock, in describing presentation system                     
          6    10 (i.e., the central location), explains that "[p]referably, the digitized video information is stored                
          7    in a compressed form."  Pocock, col. 4, ll. 39-40.  When considered in light of the fact that "[t]he                   
          8    presentation system 10 processes the incoming requests from the viewers and retrieves video                            
          9    frames and accompanying audio associated with the presentations desired by the various                                 
         10    viewers," id. at col. 3, ll. 42-45, it is clear that compression of the stored video information                       
         11    occurs prior to receipt of a request for the video information.  The retrieved compressed video                        
         12    frames can be transmitted in their compressed format to the user terminal, which will effect                           
         13    decompression and display of the presentation.     Id. at col. 19, ll. 43-61.  Dr. Koopman is                          
         14    therefore incorrect to deny that Pocock discloses compressing a response prior to receipt of a                         
         15    query.  2d Koopman Decl. at 195-96, paras. 428-29.                                                                     
         16            Concerning the recited differential compression, the examiner notes that Pocock fails to                       
         17    specify the type of compression performed and argues that “[Catros] expressly suggest[s] the                           
         18    benefits of differential compression such as simplicity of application (col. 1) and the                                
         19    improvement made [by Catros] as discussed in Col. 5, lines 2-22.”  3d Action at 103, para. 43;                         
         20    Final Action at 257, para. 42.  Catros discloses bit-rate compression of digital television signals.                   
         21    Catros, col. 1, ll. 9-11.  Figure 1 shows a prior-art differential coding system that employs                          
                                                            - 75 -                                                                    





Page:  Previous  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007