Ex Parte 5253341 et al - Page 71




               Reexamination Control No. 90/005,742                                                                                   
               Patent 5,253,341                                                                                                       

          1    sends instructions to the presentation system over an existing wire or fiber optic telephone                           
          2    network 12.  Id. at col. 3, ll. 26-32.  The presentation system responds by encoding the video                         
          3    frames of the requested presentation with the address of the user and sending the presentation to                      
          4    the user over one or more channels of a CATV network.        Id. at col. 3, ll. 45-59.  The user                       
          5    terminal searches the frames transmitted over that channel or channels for those which are                             
          6    encoded with its particular address, and stores each such frame, one at a time, in a frame store,                      
          7    with the stored frame being continually retransmitted from the terminal 14 to the viewer's                             
          8    television receiver 36 for display as a still frame. Id. at col. 4, ll. 17-23.                                         
          9            Steps (a) to (d) of claim 93 clearly read on the foregoing disclosures in Pocock.  The                         
         10    examiner reads step (e), which requires that the displaying step commence before said step of                          
         11    receiving said compressed or non-compressed response has been completed, on the following                              
         12    sentence in Pocock (col. 4, ll. 23-25): "When the next frame in a desired presentation reaches the                     
         13    user terminal, it replaces the preceding frame in the frame store and is then displayed."                              
         14    3d Action at 96, para. 35.  Dr. Koopman argues that the claim language is not satisfied, because                       
         15    each video frame, upon which he reads the claimed "response," is written into the frame store in                       
         16    its entirety before read-out begins.  2d Koopman Decl. at 186, para. 403. The examiner, correctly                      
         17    in our view, explains that the claimed "response" can be read on Pocock's "presentation," which                        
         18    consists of a plurality of video frames, and that display of the presentation begins before the last                   
         19                                                                                                                           
         20    frame of the presentation has been stored at the user terminal.  Answer at 206, para. 403.  We are                     
         21    therefore affirming the rejection of claim 93 for anticipation by Pocock.                                              
                                                            - 71 -                                                                    





Page:  Previous  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007