Ex Parte 5854038 et al - Page 12


                   Appeal No. 2006-0735                                                                                             
                   Reexamination Control No. 90/006,036                                                                             

                   therapeutic agent, wherein the localization signal causes the therapeutic agent to be                            
                   localized with a viral target in a cellular or viral compartment of the cell” (Brief at 10).                     
                   In particular, it is patentee’s position that Hu does not teach that an HIV-1 packaging                          
                   signal is tethered to the therapeutic agent.  (Brief at 9).                                                      
                           It is the examiner’s position that “all of the constructs [of Hu] inherently contain                     
                   an RNA packaging signal between the U5 portion of the LTR and the beginning of Gag.”                             
                   (Answer at 6).  The examiner notes that Hu teaches that the HIV-1 molecular clone that is                        
                   used to make the HIV-1 antisense clone “retains all of the natural HIV-1 structures and                          
                   machinery.”  The examiner points to Hu’s teaching that “[t]he antisense virus is                                 
                   infectious and has the same ‘targeting’ or ‘homing’ specificity as the naturally occuring                        
                   (wild type) virus” such that it is “able to attach to and enter CD4(+) cells...just at the                       
                   natural virus.”  According to the examiner, “the ψ sequence located in the HIV-1 genome                          
                   functions by guiding the RNA form of the genome carrying the antisense/ribozyme                                  
                   molecule to the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane where virion assembly and                              
                   budding take place.”  (Answer at 6).                                                                             
                           The examiner has convincingly shown that the construct of Hu would inherently                            
                   contain the native HIV-1 packaging signal in the absence of evidence to the contrary.  In                        
                   other words, we agree that the examiner has set forth a prima facie case of anticipation                         
                   based on inherency.  Thus, it is up to patentee to show that the construct of Hu would not                       
                   contain an HIV-1 packaging signal.  In re Swinehart, 439 F.2d 210, 212-13, 169 USPQ                              
                   226, 229 (CCPA 1971)( stating that once a prima facie case of anticipation based on                              
                   inherency has been established, the burden shifts to appellant to “'prove that the subject                       
                   matter shown to be in the prior art does not possess the characteristic relied on.").                            


                                                                12                                                                  



Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007