The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte DAVID CHRIS BOYER,
MELVIN D. KISER, and STEPHEN E. SEE
______________
Appeal 2006-1080
Application 10/109,343
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: September 28, 2006
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 5 and 22, all of the claims in the
application.1
1 Contrary to Appellants’ statement re “Status of Claims” in the Substitute
Brief filed August 23, 2005, which we consider, claims 6 through 21 have
been canceled. See amendment filed February 7, 2005 (amendment 2-3).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007