Appeal 2006-1080 Application 10/109,343 Claim 1 illustrates Appellants’ invention of a porous board or fibrous material having a coating of petroleum pitch or coal tar pitch, and is representative of the claims on appeal: 1. A porous board or fibrous material having a non-tacky surface coating of less than 10 mil thickness of petroleum or coal tar pitch, and wherein said pitch is a brittle, glassy non-asphaltic solid at ambient temperature and at least a portion of said pitch penetrates into said porous board or fibrous material, said pitch having a density of about 1.20g/cc or greater, wherein the pitch has a softening point above 200F, is brittle as a neat sample at room temperature, and is applied at conditions sufficient to ensure a sufficiently thin coating and penetration of said coating into said porous surface, to prevent shattering when screws, nails, staple or other fastening means are driven into said porous board or fibrous material wherein at least about 10% of the pitch penetrates into the porous board or fibrous material. The references relied on by the Examiner are: Rothbühr US 4,154,808 May 15, 1979 Stern US 4,227,356 Oct. 14, 1980 Seitz US 4,788,803 Dec. 6, 1988 Lamport US 5,753,018 May 19, 1998 Rajalingam US 6,271,305 Aug. 7, 2001 Jackson UK 1 558 176 Jul. 7, 1976 (United Kingdom Patent Specification) Robert H. Wombles and Melvin D. Kiser (Wombles), Developing Coal Tar/Petroleum Pitches 1-5 (Koppers, Harmarville Technical Center. 2000). The Examiner has advanced the following grounds of rejection on appeal: claims 1 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over Jackson in view of Stern, as evidenced by Rajalingam, Lamport, Rothbühr and Wombles (Answer 3-5); 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007