Ex Parte Zandveld et al - Page 1




                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                                        for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   


                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                               
                                                          ____________                                                               

                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                   Ex parte: FREDERIK ZANDVELD and MARNIX C. VLOT                                                    
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                                        Appeal No. 2006-1303                                                         
                                                     Application No. 10/000,667                                                      
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                                              ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                            ____________                                                             
               Before KRASS, SAADAT and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     
               KRASS , Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  


                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                       This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 6, 7, 9-11, 13-15, 18, 19,                    
               and 21-25.                                                                                                            
                       The invention is directed to processor architecture with an independently addressable                         
               memory bank, best illustrated by reference to representative independent claim 6 reproduced as                        












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007