The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte: FREDERIK ZANDVELD and MARNIX C. VLOT ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1303 Application No. 10/000,667 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, SAADAT and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS , Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 6, 7, 9-11, 13-15, 18, 19, and 21-25. The invention is directed to processor architecture with an independently addressable memory bank, best illustrated by reference to representative independent claim 6 reproduced asPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007