Appeal No. 2006-1303
Application No. 10/000,667
instructions. Merely because it may be well known that computer instructions in a program are
in sequential order, this does not suggest the claimed arrangement whereby portions
of that sequential order of instructions are stored in separate independently addressable memory
banks.
The rejection of claims 6, 7, 9, 22, and 23 under 35 U.S.C. §102 (b) is reversed.
Moreover, since Colwell does not provide for the deficiencies of Davis, the rejection of claims
10, 11, 13-15, 18, 19, 21, 24, and 25 under 35 U.S.C. §103 is also reversed.
The examiner’s decision is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MAHSHID D. SAADAT ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
)
ALLEN R. MACDONALD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EAK/dpv
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007