Ex Parte Friedman et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-1489                                                        
          Application No. 10/452,059                                                  

               1.    A roofing element of the shingle or tile type                    
               for exterior application comprising a multi-layer                      
               structure having:                                                      
                    (a)    a skin including a first thermoplastic material;           
                    (b)    a core including a second thermoplastic                    
               material;                                                              
                    (c)    wherein the first material is a highly weather             
               resistant polymer relative to the second material;                     
               (d)    wherein the second material is a polymer having                 
               filler therein and;                                                    
                    (e)    wherein the core is comprised of a substantially           
               greater volume of second material than the volume of first             
               material that comprises the skin; and                                  
                    (f)    wherein the skin encapsulates a plurality of               
               surfaces of the core.                                                  
               The references set forth below are relied upon by the                  
          examiner as evidence of unpatentability:                                    
          Raley, Jr. (Raley)              3,669,918           Jun. 13, 1972           
          Lijzenga et al. (Lijzenga)      4,332,703           Jun.  1, 1982           
          Rowe                            4,396,665           Aug.  2, 1983           
          Friedman et al. (Friedman)      6,808,785           Oct. 26, 2004           
               We refer to the evidence appendix of the appeal brief filed            
          June 13, 2005 for a listing of the evidence relied upon by the              
          appellants in support of their patentability viewpoint.                     





                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007