Ex Parte Friedman et al - Page 8



          Appeal No. 2006-1489                                                        
          Application No. 10/452,059                                                  

          type which are indistinguishable from embodiments of the roofing            
          laminates disclosed by Rowe such as the 12 inch by 40 inch                  
          laminate flashing strip described earlier.  We hereby sustain,              
          therefore, the Section 103 rejections of all appealed claims as             
          being unpatentable over Rowe in view of either Lijzenga or Raley.           
               The decision of the examiner is affirmed.                              
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 
                                      AFFIRMED                                        




          BRADLEY R. GARRIS            )                                              
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )                                    
                                        )                                             
                    )                                                                 
                                                  )   BOARD OF PATENT                 
                    CHUNK K. PAK                 )     APPEALS AND                    
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )    INTERFERENCES                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
          PETER F. KRATZ               )                                              
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )                                    

          BRG/hh                                                                      
                                          8                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007