Ex Parte Lee - Page 3




         Appeal No. 2006-1545                                                       
         Application 10/254,326                                                     

                                   THE REFERENCES                                   
              The examiner relies on the following references:                      
              Fang et al. (Fang)    5,670,414        September 23, 1997             
              Zhang                 5,835,396         November 10, 1998             
              Shimogaki et al.    JP 10079521            March 24, 1998             
         (Shimogaki)                                                                

                                   THE REJECTIONS                                   
              Claims 42-46, 53, and 56 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
         § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhang and Shimogaki.  The              
         examiner finds that Zhang discloses a memory device with first             
         and second conductors; a steering element with first and second            
         semiconductor layers forming a PN diode; and an antifuse.  The             
         examiner finds that Zhang does not disclose the semiconductor              
         layers forming the PN diode having different band gap energy               
         levels, but that Shimogaki discloses that a heterojunction PN              
         diode shows enhanced rectification characteristics.  The examiner          
         concludes that it would have been obvious to use the                       
         heterojunction diode of Shimogaki in Zhang to enhance operation.           
              Claims 47-52, 54, and 55 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
         § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhang and Fang.  Since these           
         claims depend directly or indirectly from claim 42, we assume the          
         rejection is over Zhang, Shimogaki, and Fang.                              
              We refer to the final rejection and the examiner's answer             
         (pages referred to as "EA__") for a statement of the examiner's            


                                       - 3 -                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007