Ex Parte Lee - Page 5




         Appeal No. 2006-1545                                                       
         Application 10/254,326                                                     

         not require that first and second semiconductor materials are              
         polycrystalline or amorphous (Br9 n.1), but the materials must             
         form a heterojunction device and must be joined to first and               
         second conductors and a state change element.                              
              We look at the examiner's arguments that deal with the                
         physical combinability of Zhang and Shimogaki.                             
              The examiner states (EA4-5):                                          
              First, note that the rejection shows that Zhang is modified           
              by Shimogaki et al. and that modified device would include a          
              polycrystalline heterojunction device.  Note that Zhang               
              shows a method of forming the structure which depends on              
              forming the poly material in holes.  However, there is an             
              extensive literature and a large number of patents that show          
              that polycrystalline silicon can be formed into essentially           
              single crystal structure using catalysts and laser                    
              annealing.  [T]he process involves forming an amorphous               
              silicon layer, depositing a catalytic element, heat treating          
              to crystallize and then laser annealing the structure to              
              form near perfect single crystal material.  Thus it is well           
              within the state of the art to turn the Zhang devices into            
              single crystal devices.                                               
         That is, the examiner says that the proposed modification of               
         Zhang by Shimogaki includes a polycrystalline heterojunction               
         device even though Shimogaki is not a polycrystalline device.              
         The examiner then states that it was known how to turn the Zhang           
         polycrystalline devices into single crystal devices, evidently to          
         be compatible with Shimogaki.                                              
              Appellant argues that the examiner has not cited any art              
         teaching the techniques, the techniques are not cited in either            
         reference, and no one could be certain of their success (RBr3).            


                                       - 5 -                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007