Ex Parte Kai et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                
                 today was not written for publication and is not                   
                           binding precedent of the Board.                          

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    ___________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    ___________                                     
                               Ex parte TAKESHI KAI,                                
                           TOSHIYA SAKAI, HIROYUKI SAITOH                           
                                 and MASAHIRO SATO                                  
                                                                                   
                                   ____________                                     
                               Appeal No. 2006-1546                                 
                             Application No. 09/974,262                             
                                   _____________                                    
                              DECIDED: AUGUST 24, 2006                              
                                   _____________                                    

         Before GARRIS, WARREN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative                
         Patent Judges.                                                             
         GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on an appeal, which involves claims 1-2,           
         5-12, and 18-20.                                                           
              We AFFIRM.                                                            
              The claimed invention is directed to an airbag device                 
         designed so that, upon collision of a vehicle, an airbag is                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007