The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte TAKESHI KAI, TOSHIYA SAKAI, HIROYUKI SAITOH and MASAHIRO SATO ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1546 Application No. 09/974,262 _____________ DECIDED: AUGUST 24, 2006 _____________ Before GARRIS, WARREN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal, which involves claims 1-2, 5-12, and 18-20. We AFFIRM. The claimed invention is directed to an airbag device designed so that, upon collision of a vehicle, an airbag isPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007