Ex Parte Kai et al - Page 3


         Appeal No. 2006-1546                                                       
         Application No. 09/974,262                                                 

         member mounted at a central portion of the steering wheel for              
         supporting said air bag module, wherein:                                   
              said cover member is slidably supported on the module-                
         supporting member to cover said air bag module and said switch,            
              said cover member operates said switch when the cover                 
         member is pushed and slid relative to the module-supporting                
         member,                                                                    
              said cover member has groove-shaped tear lines formed in an           
         inner surface thereof to assure that said air bag reliably                 
         breaks the cover member along the tear lines when it is inflated           
         by said inflator, and                                                      
              said cover member has at least one independent rigidity               
         enhancing member integrally formed on the inner surface thereof            
         to assure sufficient rigidity of the cover member, said rigidity           
         enhancing member having a width which is substantially equal to            
         or larger  than a width of said tear lines over a major portion            
         in the lengthwise direction of the rigidity enhancing member.              
              The references set forth below are relied upon by the                 
         Examiner as evidence of obviousness:                                       
         Yokota 6,244,618 Jun. 12, 2001                                             
         Otsuka et al. (Otsuka)1 JP 11-139235 May 25, 1999                          
              All of the claims on appeal are rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
         § 112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written              
         description requirement.                                                   
              All of the claims on appeal are rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
         § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Yokota in view of Otsuka.              

                                                                                   
         1 Our understanding of this reference is based on the English              
         Translation of record.                                                     
                                         3                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007