Appeal No. 2006-1554 Page 2 Application No. 10/369,819 BACKGROUND The appellants’ invention relates to method for replacing a side panel member of a casing of a computer. Claim 1, reproduced below, is representative of the subject matter on appeal. A copy of all of the claims on appeal can be found in the appendix to the appellants’ brief. 1. A method of replacing a side panel member of a casing of a computer comprising: positioning the computer with a normally hidden bottom surface portion thereof exposed; and pushing a push button on the normally hidden bottom surface portion. The examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability: Miyai et al. (Miyai) 5,139,319 Aug. 18, 1992 Hrehor, Jr. et al. (Hrehor) 6,054,662 Apr. 25, 2000 The following rejections are before us for review. 1. Claims 1-3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Hrehor. 2. Claims 4-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hrehor in view of Miyai. Rather than reiterate in detail the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellants regarding this appeal, we make reference to the examiner's answer (mailed November 28, 2005) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections and to the appellants’ brief (filed November 8, 2005) and reply brief (filed March 29, 2005) for the appellants’ arguments.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007