Ex Parte Diaz et al - Page 4



             Appeal No. 2006-1554                                                   Page 4                     
             Application No. 10/369,819                                                                           
                          functioning computer [used for parts e.g.,] that is stored                              
                          in the corner of a room [surface portions being                                         
                          concealed], the computer being removed and positioned                                   
                          so as to gain access into the casing when a part is needed                              
                          [surface portions exposed – button used to unlatch a                                    
                          panel], the computer being returned to the corner when                                  
                          not needed [restoration of the normally hidden surface                                  
                          portions].  (Answer, pp. 4-5 (emphasis in original.))                                   
                    The appellants contend that Hrehor discloses that the push button (211) is to                 
             be “accessible from the front of computer system 201.”  Brief, p. 12 (citing Hrehor,                 
             col. 4, lines 30-44).  The appellants argue that Hrehor does not disclose that the                   
             push button (211) is located on a “normally hidden bottom surface portion” as                        
             recited in claim 1.  Brief, p. 13.  With regard to the examiner’s position on                        
             inherency, the appellants argue that use as a parts computer is not the normal use                   
             for a computer device.  Rather, the appellants contend that the normal use for a                     
             computer device is as a functioning computer, and, in this normal use, the front                     
             panel of the computer must be accessible since it contains drive access slots, etc.                  
             Brief, p. 15.  As such, the appellants challenge the examiner’s finding that a                       
             general application of the structure of Hrehor would inherently encompass the step                   
             of positioning the computer with a normally hidden bottom surface portion thereof                    
             exposed, because the push button (211) of Hrehor is already exposed when the                         
             computer is in its normal operating position.  Brief, p. 15.                                         
                    We agree with the appellants’ positions.  First, we agree that Hrehor does                    
             not disclose the step of pushing a push button on the normally hidden bottom                         
             surface portion, because the push button (211) of Hrehor is clearly disclosed as                     
             located on the front bezel panel (209) so that it is accessible from the front of the                
             computer system (201).  Hrehor, col. 4, lines 28-31.                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007