Appeal No. 2006-1643 Παγε 21 Application No. 09/845,589 From our review of claim 18, the claim requires printing the visual information and instructions to facilitate a user cutting out the images and fixing them to the scrapbook page. From the disclosure of FJCP of the greeting card including the greeting (printed matter) and the photograph, we find that FJCP teaches or suggests printing out the photograph along with the printed matter on the same substrate. As to the printing of the instructions to facilitate the user in making the scrapbook page, we find that the instructions are non-functional descriptive material that do not produce a new and unobvious relationship between the descriptive material and the substrate. The rejection of claim 18 is sustained for the same reasons as we sustained the rejections of claims 1 and 15. We turn next to claim 23. Appellants rely upon the arguments presented for the reversal of the rejection of claim 1. Appellants additionally argue (brief, page 13) that FJCP and Monn say nothing about a user providing the images and say nothing about modifying a provided image. The examiner’s position (answer, page 6) is that claim 23 is rejected for the same reasons as claim 1. Claim 23 requires that at least one portion of a digital image is provided by the user and that the image is modified toPage: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007