Appeal No. 2006-1643 Παγε 23
Application No. 09/845,589
At the outset, we make reference to our findings, supra,
with respect to the teachings and suggestions of FJCP and Monn.
Claim 24 recites an image product produced by the method of
claim 23. We will sustain the rejection of claim 24 for the same
reasons as we sustained the rejection of claim 23, and add that
the scrapbook page resulting from the combined teachings of FJCP
and Monn would have suggested the limitations of claim 24, in the
same manner as they meet the limitations of claim 23.
We turn next to claim 25. Appellants rely upon the
arguments presented for the reversal of the rejection of claim 1.
In addition, appellants assert (brief, page 14) that style
selection capability and production of images responsive thereto
is not provided, taught or suggested by FJCP or Monn.
The examiner’s position (answer, page 6) is that claim 25 is
rejected for the same reasons as claim 1. Claim 25 recites,
inter alia, “allowing the user to specify reproduction of the
image as a series of images with different characteristics
associated with a scrapbook page style” and “creating the images
responsive to the style.” This is met by the user in FJCP
specifying the pictures to be printed as the Total Choice
Collection where three different sizes of the same image are
printed on the same photograph substrate. Upon selecting the
Page: Previous 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007