Appeal No. 2006-1643 Παγε 28
Application No. 09/845,589
provider that is sent the picture by the user to create the
scrapbook page suggested by the combined teachings of FJCP and
Monn. That is, instead of going to the FJCP site and selecting a
picture and sheet configuration, that a user would be taught to
send a picture to the provider, with instructions for a collage
picture sheet or sheets, and have the provider follow the user’s
instructions in creating the album requested by the user.
Accordingly, we are not convinced of any error on the part of the
examiner in rejecting claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). The
rejection of claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is sustained. In
addition, we will sustain the rejection of claim 21 because
FJCP’s disclosure of charges for different products would have
suggested to an artisan making payment to the provider for the
product received. We will likewise sustain the rejection of
claim 22 in view of Morag’s disclosure of accessing the provider
over the Internet. Since the provider is being contacted by the
user over the Internet, the provider would have been motivated to
accept payment from the purchaser over the Internet, due to the
common use of the Internet as a way to pay for products ordered
over the Internet.
Page: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007