The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte KIMIKAZU MATSUMOTO __________ Appeal No. 2006-1654 Application No. 09/929,488 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-17. The disclosed invention pertains to an active matrix type liquid crystal display device.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007