Appeal No. 2006-1654
Application No. 09/929,488
3. Claims 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Baur in view of Ohta ‘053
[answer, pages 9-12].
4. Claims 1-7 and 10-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Baur in view of
Ohta ‘116 [answer, pages 13-15].
5. Claims 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Baur in view of Ohta ‘116 and
further in view of Admitted Prior Art [answer, pages 16 and 17].
6. Claims 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Baur in view of Ohta ‘116, and
further in view of Ohta ‘053 [answer, pages 18-21].
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the examiner, we
make reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the
rejections advanced by the examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007