Appeal No. 2006-1729 Application No. 10/107,628 tree is that any combination of odd number of errors on its inputs propagates to their outputs, and any combination of even number of errors remains undetected. At page 4, paragraph 0041, Rajski discloses the following: FIG. 9 shows another embodiment of a selective compactor 80 that is coupled to scan chains 82. The selective compactor includes a selector circuit 84, which is identical to the selector circuit 46 described in relation to FIG. 8. The selective compactor 80 also includes a time compactor 84, which is well understood in the art to be a circular compactor. The time compactor includes multiple flip-flops 86 and XOR gates 88 coupled in series. A reset line 90 is coupled to the flip-flops 86 to reset the compactor 84. The reset line may be reset multiple times while reading the scan chains. Output register 92 provides a valid output of the compactor 84 upon activation of a read line 94. With the above discussion in mind, we find that the Rajski reference teaches a method for selectively compacting test responses scan chains into a compressed output. Particularly, as depicted in figure 9, Rajski teaches a plurality of scan chain inputs (82) that are fed into a compactor (80) to produce a plurality of outputs (92). Rasjki also teaches that each of the plurality of inputs is coupled to at least one of the plurality of outputs via an X-OR gate (88). One of ordinary skill in the art would have readily observed from Rajski’s illustration of the coupling of scan chain inputs with scan chain outputs through X- OR gates that each of the inputs are coupled to the outputs in a 12Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007