Appeal No. 2006-2084 Reexamination Control No. 90/006,360 Patent owner proffers the declaration of Mr. William R. Fountaine, submitted December 31, 2004, as evidence of commercial success. Mr. Fountaine's declaration states (¶¶ 3-6): 3. Since 1996, Max Bar has manufactured and sold vertical toolholders having a maximum width of 7 mm or 8 mm (the "Small Shank Vertical Toolholders") and associated 35° cutting inserts (the "Vertical Inserts") covered by one or more of claims 2, 11 and 17-18 of the '400 patent. 4. Following introduction of Max Bar's Small Shank Vertical Toolholder and Vertical Inserts on April 16, 1996 through July 4, 1997, Max Bar tools sold 406 Small Shank Vertical Toolholders and 3,704 Vertical Inserts. 5. From February 2000 to October 2004, Max Bar has sold approximately 2581 Small Shank Vertical Toolholders and approximately 110,000 Vertical Inserts. 6. Because Max Bar changed its computer accounting system in February 2000, it is difficult for Max Bar to obtain exact figures for sales of the patented products between July 1997 and February 2000. It is my recollection that sales during that period were comparable to the sales from February 2000 to October 2004. Commercial success is not proved simply by sales figures. "This court has noted in the past that evidence related solely to the number of units sold provides a very weak showing of commercial success, if any." Huang, 100 F.3d at 140, 40 USPQ2d at 1689; Kansas Jack, Inc. v. Kuhn, 719 F.2d 1144, 1151, - 52 -Page: Previous 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007