The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ELLIOT A. GOTTFURCHT, GRANT E. GOTTFURCHT
J. TEAGUE MCKNIGHT, MANUEL V. BELTRAN, STEPHEN K. WOESNER,
JOHN A. MARINUZZI, ALBERT-MICHEL C. LONG
and DONALD L. DUKESHIRE
____________
Appeal No. 2006-2191
Application No. 10/108,147
____________
HEARD: SEPTEMBER 13, 2006
____________
Before KRASS, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from
the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 40-45, 54-59 and 105-
137. Claims 1-17, 39, 46-53 and 60-77 have been canceled while
claims 18-38 and 78-104 have been withdrawn from consideration.
We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Appellants’ invention is directed to a method and system for
facilitating navigation of the Internet or other content sources
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007