Appeal No. 2006-2191
Application No. 10/108,147
formatting Ward’s accessed advertisements to one of ordinary
skill in the art. Thus, assuming, arguendo, that it would have
been obvious to combine Ward and Fujita, as held by the Examiner,
the combination would still fall short of teaching or suggesting
the claimed formatting content accessed via the Internet, as
recited in independent claims 105, 121 and 137 . Accordingly,
based on the weight of the evidence and the arguments presented
by the Examiner and Appellants, we do not sustain the 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 rejection of claims 40-45, 54-59 and 105-137 over Ward and
Fujita.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007